Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(4): 801-809, 2024 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38334390

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the genomic diversity and ß-lactam susceptibilities of Enterococcus faecalis collected from patients with infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: We collected 60 contemporary E. faecalis isolates from definite or probable IE cases identified between 2018 and 2021 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. We used whole-genome sequencing to study bacterial genomic diversity and employed antibiotic checkerboard assays and a one-compartment pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to investigate bacterial susceptibility to ampicillin and ceftriaxone both alone and in combination. RESULTS: Genetically diverse E. faecalis were collected, however, isolates belonging to two STs, ST6 and ST179, were collected from 21/60 (35%) IE patients. All ST6 isolates encoded a previously described mutation upstream of penicillin-binding protein 4 (pbp4) that is associated with pbp4 overexpression. ST6 isolates had higher ceftriaxone MICs and higher fractional inhibitory concentration index values for ampicillin and ceftriaxone (AC) compared to other isolates, suggesting diminished in vitro AC synergy against this lineage. Introduction of the pbp4 upstream mutation found among ST6 isolates caused increased ceftriaxone resistance in a laboratory E. faecalis isolate. PK/PD testing showed that a representative ST6 isolate exhibited attenuated efficacy of AC combination therapy at humanized antibiotic exposures. CONCLUSIONS: We find evidence for diminished in vitro AC activity among a subset of E. faecalis IE isolates with increased pbp4 expression. These findings suggest that alternate antibiotic combinations against diverse contemporary E. faecalis IE isolates should be evaluated.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Humanos , Ceftriaxona/farmacología , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Enterococcus faecalis , Ampicilina/farmacología , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Quimioterapia Combinada
2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(4): ofab102, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34805443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ampicillin-ceftriaxone (AC) has emerged as an alternative antibiotic regimen for enterococcal infective endocarditis (EIE) with reduced toxicity compared with ampicillin-gentamicin (AG), but evidence regarding its success in reducing EIE-associated death in the United States is limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort analysis of EIE patients treated with AC or AG between 2010 and 2017 at 3 hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We assessed all-cause 90-day mortality as the primary outcome and in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions, adverse events, and relapse of bacteremia as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients with EIE (100 treated with AC and 90 with AG) were included. Ninety-day mortality was significantly higher with AC than AG (21% vs 8%; P = .02). After propensity score matching, 56 patients in each group remained for the outcomes analysis. Documented aminoglycoside resistance, presence of annular or aortic abscess, and complete pacemaker removal were the significantly different variables between the 2 matched cohorts. We observed no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality between the 2 treatment groups (11% vs 7%; P = .55). Adverse events were more common in patients treated with AG (25 vs 39; P = .0091), and more patients in the propensity score-matched AG cohort switched antibiotic regimens than in the AC group (10% vs 49%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with AC demonstrate no significant differences in mortality, treatment failure, or bacteremia relapse compared with AG in a propensity score-matched EIE cohort.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...